Art of USNA

Sun Tzu’s over-arching philosophy throughout Art of War is that the most knowledgeable commander will be able to lead his force to victory, even if a battle does not occur. Sun Tzu writes about how much of a battle is won before the battle even begins, because of preparations, deception, and wisdom of warfare. The Naval Academy does not educate midshipmen on how to become such a leader, but it does prepare them to seize the opportunity to become one. 

The most important military skill that Sun Tzu identifies and that the Naval Academy teaches is that of discipline. Sun Tzu states that “discipline is organization, chain of command, control of expenditure” (Sun Tzu, 4). The Naval Academy teaches discipline to midshipmen first through explicit instruction, and then through practice and finally through perspective. Midshipmen learn about each factor of discipline through their professional knowledge studies and everyday life at the bottom of the chain of command. 

Everyday life of a midshipman also consists of the minimum standard of exceptional organization to any other standard. Each room and desk must be clean and neat every day, and every individual must have a clear understanding of their agenda in order to cope with many extra activities that are often thrown into their schedules at the last minute, such as mandatory briefs or trainings. Along with providing discipline, the Naval Academy offers countless different experiences to help broaden the skillsets of those who participate, which also helps midshipmen to develop a talent at seizing opportunities when they are presented. Sun Tzu also recognizes opportunism and flexibility as military virtues (Ancient China , 46). 

Despite good foundational skills regarding discipline and the development of strong military virtues in midshipmen, the Naval Academy does not actually do much to educate midshipmen on how to become Sun Tzu’s prodigious general. The only way to become a general capable of defeating the enemy’s strategy, the best way to win a conflict, is to have firsthand experience doing it. For example, Sun Tzu writes about one of the five main considerations of war: “the Way causes men to be of one mind with their rulers, to live or die with them, and never to waver” (Sun Tzu, 3). At the Naval Academy, many people are here for their own reasons. Such reasons include personal ambition for a promotion, the prestige of being a Naval Academy graduate, the world-class education, the stellar leadership experience, and the unique opportunities within the United States Navy and Marine Corps upon graduation. The brigade of midshipmen does not adhere to Sun Tzu’s “Way”, and so even brigade leadership will not have the opportunity to learn about how to foster such a harmony among those they are supposed to be leading. 

The Naval Academy is not capable of producing the omniscient general spoken of throughout the Art of War. However, that is not a failure of the Naval Academy, but rather an acknowledgement that gaining experience through learning firsthand has no parallels. The Naval Academy does do a very effective job at instilling discipline and opportunism into its graduates, two qualities that are essential to being a good leader. The Naval Academy does not transform its midshipmen into exceptional leaders, but it does give them the stepping stones that lead down the right path.

Seth Viani 551

Sun Tzu, Art of War

Ancient China V. Art of War (Sun Tzu)

3 thoughts on “Art of USNA

  1. I completely agree with your assessment of the Naval Academy and how it prepares us to be good leaders. I especially agree that the academy does not automatically produce graduates that are good leaders, however it does give us the tools needed for us to pursue greatness. Probably the most important tool is time management which will be very important when we graduate and become leaders. Though we do not have the firsthand experience of defeating the enemies strategy, we do have resources of many great officers and enlisted personnel who have defeated the enemies strategy and they are here to mentor us. The tools are here for us, we must decide if we will take advantage of them, or slip through the system.

    Like

  2. I really like your post here Seth, I think your ideas are extremely well thought out and definitely take into account some of the shortcomings of the Naval Academy as a whole. I would disagree in a manner that the Academy doesn’t give firsthand experience. While it may not be possible to give students here the ability to go out into the fleet and actually serve as Naval Officers, the Academy does it’s best by sending us on summer trainings where we learn from those who are serving. We get as close to firsthand experience as possible, and it gives us some idea as to what we could face in the future as Naval Officers. I do agree with your idea that this place does not simply ‘produce’ leaders, but rather gives them an opportunity to grow as one so that we are not completely incapable when we join the fleet. Many people here who do not necessarily hold the billets that are deemed as significant or important still develop their leadership skills by mentoring those below them in the chain of command, and their peers. The system in place here allows all those, regardless of rank or billet to gain some leadership experience, and puts us in a place to increase our skills in the future.

    Like

  3. I agree that the academy does prepare us to become a leader through the small and simple things that we may find as unnecessary. I like that you incorporated where Tzu and the Academy do not align. Many mids have a lot to say about what they would do in a situation, but they’ve never actually experienced the situation before, so they wouldn’t know how to actually go about it. I’m glad you brought up brigade leadership and how the different thought processes of people can cause dysfunction rather than harmony. If people aren’t on one accord and have their own agendas, then there can’t be that sense of unity. For instance, there could be two mids who hold the same position, but one takes their job more serious than the other. SInce both mids aren’t on the same page, people wouldn’t know the seriousness of a task, and wouldn’t be positive on how to go about that task. I liked that you incorporated examples with each of Tzu’s sayings. This strengthened your argument.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website at WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: